Repository navigation
[CRE-7294] Fix double counting of capability concurrency limit - #24163
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
I see you updated files related to
|
Contributor
|
✅ No conflicts with other open PRs targeting |
jmank88
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2026
|
justinkaseman
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Each capability call acquired two slots from the same per-workflow
CapabilityConcurrencypool: one in the WASM host (PendingCallsLimiter) and one in the engine. Under bursts, executions holding their first slot could starve each other and hang until the execution timeout.The WASM host now gets its own pool (
WASMModulePendingCalls) with the same limit, so each call takes one slot from each pool.JIRA: CRE-7294
Deployment Validation
resource_PerWorkflow_CapabilityConcurrencyLimit_usagedrops ~2x on upgraded nodes vs. non-upgraded nodes in the same DON, and is never pinned at its limit during bursts.🤖 Generated with Claude Code