[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• https://github.com/psf/black → https://github.com/psf/black-pre-commit-mirror
• github.com/psf/black-pre-commit-mirror: 24.10.0 → 26.10.1
• github.com/pycqa/isort: 5.13.2 → 10.0.0b2

[github-actions]

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-557.fastapi-code-generator.pages.dev

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 29.83%

3 warnings, 1 note

⚠️ Walltime results may be unreliable

Some benchmarks used the Walltime instrument outside CodSpeed Macro Runners, which can make the results inconsistent.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 1 benchmark with a significant change ran on different hardware

Its base and head results were measured on machines with a different CPU, core count or memory, so the change might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 1 benchmark with a significant change ran in a different software environment

Its base and head results were measured with a different OS or toolchain, such as compiler, runtime or library versions, so the change might come from this difference rather than from the code. Open the benchmark to see what changed.

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: the symbols of the profiling trace could not be resolved, because no information about the language frames was collected.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 1 improved benchmark

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	test_generate_default_template_benchmark	26.3 ms	20.2 ms	+29.83%

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing pre-commit-ci-update-config (60d1209) with main (7fd4ee2)}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (7fd4ee2) to head (60d1209).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #557   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           17        17           
  Lines         1548      1547    -1     
  Branches       163       163           
=========================================
- Hits          1548      1547    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 6b5c4d49-c130-4101-972e-e295d1dc5bd6

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• Trigger review

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn