Repository navigation
Document the visibility cost of data attributes in Temporal memo - #610
Closed
ahmadmaha02 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
ahmadmaha02 wants to merge 1 commit into
ahmadmaha02 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
ahmadmaha02
force-pushed
the
fix/visibility-memo-page-size
branch
from
October 26, 2026 03:24
fdb2064 to
bd2031c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Document that
useMemoForDataAttributescopies data attributes into Temporal visibility rows, and that external storage can keep large values out of those memos. This is an opt-in feature; disabling it for new workflows does not remove existing memos.No search behavior changes. Temporal UI does not call the iWF search endpoint, and the Cloud SQL alert in #609 has not been tied to a particular query.
Checklist
go test ./service/api -count=1; integration tests not run)Related Issue
Refs #609