Repository navigation
Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The model could miscount repeated symbols while explaining a failing test. In the reported movie-review case, the code contained ten stars but lacked the numeric rating after them. Socrates incorrectly claimed there were eleven or twelve stars and told the learner to change code that was already correct.
Socrates now computes counts of consecutive pictorial symbols in the student's source and includes those counts in the prompt. The helper uses Unicode character categories and grapheme clusters, so it works with mixed symbols and compound emoji. Updated instructions and contrasting examples guide the model to use those counts and identify which requirement actually failed when a test checks multiple conditions.