Repository navigation
Adds bytes read reporting for SDF. #40639
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
acrites
wants to merge
6
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
acrites:is_splittable_fn
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
827847d
Adds bytes read reporting for SDF SplittableProcessFn ParDos.
acrites f8cdf2a
Removes code not intended for this PR. Gets rid of duplicated trackAu…
acrites 6acab49
Ran spotlessApply
acrites 45cde4e
Fixed failing test
acrites 293c6ac
Fixup setup for newly added tests.
acrites 9f6dfe8
Add output counter to all outputs of source stages, not just the main…
acrites File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this seems brittle. I'm not very familiar with this code but perhaps Kenn will have a cleaner way of doing this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My first thought was to add something more generically to ParDo, but I feel that this is more of a Dataflow implementation detail that we even need to do this, so I'd rather not add something to the generic API to specify which ParDo's should be reporting their bytes to autoscaling. Maybe there's some way to add something to the CloudObject in SplittableProcessFnFactory.java?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here were some alternatives provided by AI, though it's first recommendation is what I didn't really want to do:
Add default boolean isSplittable() { return false; } (or shouldReportBytesRead()) on ParDoFn (and delegate in ForwardingParDoFn).
Determine it via the actual DoFn class rather than any string: SplittableProcessFnFactory.ProcessFnExtractor wraps the user DoFn in SplittableParDoViaKeyedWorkItems.ProcessFn, which is already accessible at construction time via helpers.doFnInstanceManager.peek().getDoFn() instanceof ProcessFn inside SimpleParDoFnHelpers (used by both SimpleParDoFn and StreamingKeyedWorkItemSideInputParDoFn).
Alternatively, SplittableProcessFnFactory.createDefault() (or UserParDoFnFactory.streamingKeyedWorkItem, which is already true exclusively for SplittableProcessFnFactory) can set/wrap that flag on the returned ParDoFn.
IntrinsicMapTaskExecutorFactory then simply checks if (fn.isSplittable()), keeping all CloudObject dispatch encapsulated inside DefaultParDoFnFactory.
If you don't want to touch the public ParDoFn interface, SplittableProcessFnFactory can wrap the ParDoFn produced by UserParDoFnFactory in a package-private SplittableParDoFn extends ForwardingParDoFn (or marker interface), allowing fn instanceof SplittableParDoFn in IntrinsicMapTaskExecutorFactory.
If you prefer keeping the check on cloudUserFn.getClassName(), extracting a shared constant (e.g., SplittableProcessFnFactory.OBJECT_TYPE_NAME = "SplittableProcessFn") used by DefaultParDoFnFactory, IntrinsicMapTaskExecutorFactory, and tests avoids duplicating the string literal (similar to ComputationWorkExecutorFactory.isCustomSource), though Option 1 or 2 is cleaner since it delegates the classification to ParDoFnFactory.