Repository navigation
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
I wonder if the French community felt the need to duplicate the boundary because Paris is a peer of administrative areas at multiple levels. In 2024, the U.S. community decided against modeling consolidated city-cities as redundant boundaries. We handled every case individually based on the exact nature of the consolidation. For example:
I’m unfamiliar with the administrative structure in France, but maybe the French community would be interested in taking a closer look. I agree that OSM can be messy, but for something as famous as Paris, I’m sure you’d get some opinions by contacting the French community on their forum. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
this was recently raised in valhalla/web-app#406 and followed up with manual de-duplication at valhalla/web-app#407.
consider just a "Paris" query:
there's 3 duplicate entries which have the exact same geometries but different
admin_levels:I know OSM admins are messy, but I wonder if all 3 are really legit relations or if there's sense in de-duplication at/post geocoder data ingestion?
sorry for the OSM admin & geocoding noob question;)
All reactions